|
U.S. Geological Survey USGS Internal Access Only |
||||
Water-Quality Issues |
||||
|
I Anthropogenic Contaminants in Ground WaterThe discussion of anthropogenic contaminants in water will focus on similarities among and differences between the aquifer types. For this analysis, however, variations in land use overlying the aquifer in general and at each well are a factor that makes this analysis difficult. The difficulty arises in trying to conclude whether a given aquifer is actually less susceptible to contamination or the contaminant source is simply not present near a well sampling location. The approach will be to discuss aquifer type and land use in general, and attempt to draw conclusions from the information available. Of the eight studies conducted, only two were land-use studies. The ACFB conducted an urban land use study and the LSUS conducted an agricultural land use study. The remaining six studies were subunit surveys that had a mixture of land use types. In general, these are rural and suburban areas; however, the land uses surrounding each well was not considered in this analysis. Nitrate One of the major anthropogenic contaminants analyzed by all of the studies was nitrate. Nitrate is commonly the dominant form of nitrogen found in ground water. Concentrations of nitrate above 3 mg/L are considered an indicator of anthropogenic activity. The results of the nitrate analysis illustrated in figure 5 shows several themes. One is the susceptibility of the carbonate aquifer to nitrate contamination (fig. 5, lsuslusag1). Carbonate aquifers have numerous features that allow direct contamination of the aquifer, and this area also has significant inputs of fertilizer and manure (Lindsey and others, 1997).The study that documented the second highest median nitrate concentration was the lsussus2 subunit survey of a crystalline aquifer, in an area with high inputs of fertilizer and manure (Lindsey and others, 1997). This shows that crystalline aquifers with high inputs of nitrogen have potential for high nitrate concentrations. The statistics from the land use/land cover within a 500 m radius of the wells in the delrsus1 study indicated the land use to be 46 percent agricultural, 33 percent forested, and 18 percent urban. Samples from wells in this study had the third highest median nitrate concentration. The samples from wells in the urban land use study had the next highest median nitrate concentration. Samples from wells in the remaining studies had low median nitrate concentrations, and interpretations of these data would probably show that land use surrounding the well was a significant factor affecting nitrate concentrations. Only the lsuslus1 and lussus2 studies had median concentrations greater than 3 mg/L; however, all of the studies had at least one sample with concentrations greater than 3 mg/L (fig. 5). Pesticides Pesticides are another set of major anthropogenic compounds analyzed by all NAWQA studies. The analysis of pesticide concentrations for this assessment of the PAS was based on atrazine, the most frequently detected pesticide in ground water samples collected by the NAWQA program, and metolachlor, a pesticide that ranks high in use, but has a lower detection frequency in ground water (Pesticide National Synthesis Project, 1997). The pattern observed for atrazine and metolachlor was similar to the pattern for nitrate, with higher concentrations and frequent detections in the carbonate aquifer and the crystalline aquifer with a high percentage of agricultural land use (lsuslusag1 and lsussus2, fig. 6). The delrsus1 study had a higher detection rate of these pesticides than the linjsus3 study. Although both are Siliciclastic aquifers, the agricultural land use in the two areas may have been more in the delrsus1 study and the use of both metolachlor and atrazine are much less in the LINJ overall than in the DELR study unit. Several studies had a small number of detections of the two pesticides. This would be expected for the urban study (acfblusur1) where agricultural pesticides are not commonly used. In the other areas it is difficult to determine whether the result is because the aquifer is not susceptible or the chemicals are not used in significant amounts. VOC’s The interpretation of volatile organic compounds (VOC’s) occurrence for this assessment of the PAS is based on the analyses for chloroform and methyl-tert butyl ether (MTBE) in six of the eight studies. Samples from the POTO study unit were not analyzed for VOC’s. Detections of chloroform were highest in the delrsus1, linjsus3, and santsus3 studies. Detections of MTBE were highest in the delrsus1 and linjsus3 studies. The significance of these findings may be masked by the lowering of detection limits from the 1991 study units to the 1994 study units. The detection limits for chloroform for the 1991 and 1994 study units were <0.20ug/L and <0.0520ug/L, respectively. The detection limits for MTBE for the 1991 and 1994 study units were 0.20ug/L and 0.170ug/L, respectively. It is difficult to make an accurate comparison of the low number of detections of chloroform and MTBE in the urban land use study (acfblusur1--a 1991 study unit) to the DELR, LINJ, and SANT studies which have data reported at a lower detection limit (fig.7) A reanalysis of the data at a common detection limit would be useful in determining the differences caused by the change in detection limit.In general, the aquifers studied in the Weaknesses of the available data from individual study units
|
||||
|
|
||||
| Go to the Piedmont and Blue Ridge crystalline and carbonate-rock aquifers Home Page | ||||
| Go to the NAWQA Ground-Water Synthesis by Principal Aquifer Home Page | ||||