Water-Resources Investigations Report 92-4060, Comparison of Conventional Onsite Recorders and Satellite Telemetry for Surface-Water Data Collection
In Reply Refer To: November 30, 1992
Mail Stop 415
OFFICE OF SURFACE WATER TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 93.03
Subject: Water-Resources Investigations Report 92-4060,
Comparison of Conventional Onsite Recorders and
Satellite Telemetry for Surface-Water Data Collection
by the U.S. Geological Survey by Charles Parrett and
E.F. Hubbard, Jr.
The purpose of this memorandum is to announce and transmit to
field offices the subject report, which details a study comparing
the measurement of water levels at gaging stations with
conventional on-site recorders to measurement by satellite
telemetry. Based on data related to the time required to operate
either type of installation, which were tabulated by eight
participating Districts in 1989, there are general indications
that the operation of satellite-telemetry stations took somewhat
more time than conventional recorders. These stations also tended
to have more missing record, largely caused by gaps in the
transmitted data, which contributed significantly to the time
required for operation.
Supplementary information collected as part of the study, however,
indicates that the real benefit of satellite telemetry is not time
saved in the operation of the stations but in fulfilling the need
of cooperators and the public for real-time data. Other benefits
included better knowledge of network performance, easier tracking
of hydrologic events, and overall improvements in the quality of
the gage-height data.
Copies of this report may be obtained from the authors:
Charles Parrett or E.F. Hubbard
CPARRET EHUBBARD
(406)449-5263 (703)648-5312
Ernest F. Hubbard
Assistant Chief
Office of Surface Water
Attachment
WRD DISTRIBUTION: FO
A, B, PO without attachment