End of Appraisal Period
To: USGS All
cc: Eleanor G Fisher/OPS/USGS/DOI@USGS
Subject: End of Appraisal Period
In Response Reply To: August 22, 2000
Mail Stop 601
Note to supervisors, managers, and team leaders: Please ensure that
employees without access to e-mail receive a copy of this message.
MEMORANDUM
To: All U.S. Geological Survey Employees
From: Robert Hosenfeld (signed)
Personnel Officer
Subject: End of Appraisal Period
The U.S. Geological Survey's (USGS) current appraisal period for most USGS
employees ends September 30, 2000. Finalized annual performance
appraisals for all employees who are on the rolls as of September 30,
2000, except those in the Senior Executive Service, are due to the
servicing personnel office by December 15, 2000. If an employee is new to
the USGS, or recently reassigned to a position with significantly
different duties, the supervisor and employee should ensure a performance
plan is developed and certified as soon as possible, but no later than the
end of the rating period. Employees who have not had a performance plan
for at least 90 calendar days prior to September 30, 2000, must have the
rating period extended until they have worked under a performance plan for
90 calendar days. Once the employee completes 90 calendar days under the
performance plan, a performance appraisal must be completed within 60 days
of the extended rating period.
Because the USGS reorganization coincides with the end of the appraisal
period, we ask supervisors to ensure they complete their employees'
performance appraisals for this rating period in a timely manner.
Employees affected by the reorganization will receive their 2000
performance appraisal from their current supervisors. These employees
will receive performance plans for the rating year ending September 2001
from their new supervisors.
When completing the annual performance appraisal, rating officials must
conduct a performance review discussion with each employee. This review
provides an opportunity for the rating official to discuss the employee's
performance during the past year, to begin discussion of performance
plans for the coming year, and identify the employee's training and
developmental needs. At the end of the performance review,
the employee signs and dates the rating in Part IV on page 2 of Form
DI-2002. If, for any reason, the employee declines to sign the rating,
the rating official notes on the form that the rating was discussed with
the employee. The rating official keeps a copy of the completed appraisal
form, gives a copy to the employee, and sends the original to the
servicing personnel office.
A Quality Step Increase (QSI) recognizes employees who demonstrate
exceptionally high levels of quality performance throughout the year.
Specific eligibility criteria and processing information can be found on
the Human Resources website at
http://www.usgs.gov:8888/ops/hro/perf/awards/money.html.
An employee failing to achieve one or more critical results must receive a
"results not achieved" summary rating in Part III on page 2 of Form
DI-2002. If a summary rating of "results not achieved" is assigned, the
rating official must prepare a written narrative describing the specific
areas in which the employee failed to achieve critical results. Rating
officials are strongly encouraged to consult with their servicing employee
relations specialist before assigning a summary rating of "results not
achieved" to discuss required remedial action.
An employee who is dissatisfied with a summary rating of Aresults not
achieved@ may discuss the matter informally with the rating and reviewing
officials, make written comments on a separate sheet and attach them to
the rating form, and/or request reconsideration of the rating by an
official at the next level above the reviewing official who was not
directly involved in the rating. The employee's reconsideration request
must be in writing, state the basis for the
request, and be submitted to the servicing personnel office within 15
calendar days following the employee's receipt of the rating. Employees
in exclusive bargaining units may have
reconsideration rights through negotiated grievance procedures, and
applicable bargaining agreements should be checked in such cases for
possible coverage.
Additional information on the two-level performance management system is
available from the updated performance management Q&A's on the Human
Resources website at http://www.usgs.gov:8888/ops/hro/perf or your
servicing personnel office.