Closing FY 1996 To: "AO - All Administrative Officers" cc: "Alice A Sabatini, Administrative Officer, Reston, VA" , "Kelly L Bradley, SUPERVISORY FINANCIAL SPEC, Reston, VA" , "Catherine L Hill, ACH/Operations, Reston, VA" Subject: Closing FY 1996 Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 16:04:48 -0500 From: "Alice A Sabatini, Administrative Officer, Reston, VA" The Division is working on guidance to all offices to discuss the changes that will occur during FY 1996 as a result of our implementation of recommendations contained in the Federal-State Cooperative Program audit report and the Policy and Operations Council decisions on assessments. The following is a brief "heads up" on issues that will be addressed more thoroughly in future WRD memos. 1. Actual cost accounting on projects will be required in FY 1996. This means that charges to projects should not be transferred between accounts for the purpose of closing out with a zero balance. We anticipate that this will result in some accounts being overspent and some being underspent at year end. This shifting of costs refers to the use of standard vouchers, PRUS adjustments, and charging labor to accounts other than those on which work was actually performed. This change in accounting practice should begin immediately. 2. Charges for unfunded/underfunded work cannot be charged to the common services (overhead) account. The practice of charging this work to the common services account spreads the costs to all customers and increases the overhead they would normally fund. Unfunded/underfunded project work should continue to be charged against the project account even if that project will have no funding during FY 1996. The practice of charging these costs to a subaccount of the 88800 account should be discontinued. This change in accounting practice should begin immediately. We will implement these changes during FY 1996 in anticipation of a change in our appropriations language that permits the use of fixed price agreements in the Federal-State Cooperative Program. We believe that these changes will improve our cost accounting practices and allow us to better estimate the cost of future work efforts. 3. It is anticipated that the assessment policies that were distributed for comment as "interim" will be effective for FY 1996. There are two that have a large impact on WRD. They are the use of net assessment rates and interdivision assessment practices. We are working on examples and procedures for both of these assessment changes and will be distributing them to all WRD offices as soon as these changes are finalized. Please be patient with us. We are developing policy and distributing guidance as quickly as we can. There is much that has not yet been finalized and developing implementation strategies and procedures takes some time.