EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES--Sterilization of Microbiological Equipment
In Reply Refer To: August 30, 1985
WGS-Mail Stop 412
QUALITY OF WATER BRANCH TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 85.18
Subject: EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES--Sterilization of
Microbiological Equipment
Recent Water-Quality program reviews have indicated a
recurring problem in some Districts--the use of non-approved
methods for sterilization of bacteriological filter
assemblies; specifically, ultraviolet irradiation. The
U.S. Geological Survey's approved method is described in
section 7.3, page 37 of TWRI, Methods for collection and
analysis of Aquatic Biological and Microbiological Samples.
It requires autoclaving for 15 minutes at l2l degrees C at
15 psi. Incomplete combustion of methanol, to produce
formaldehyde gas, is permitted for field sterilization,
although autoclaving in the laboratory is preferred.
The justification most often given for using UV irradiation
instead of autoclaving is that the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) lists ultraviolet radiation, among other
techniques, as a method of sterilization acceptable to them
in Microbiological Methods for Monitoring the Environment;
Water and Wastes, 1978. This manual however, is designed for
use by trained microbiologists operating in a laboratory
setting. And these alternative methods of sterilization are
usually used as adjuncts to primary sterilization to maintain
sterility in hoods and glove boxes. That UV irradiation does
not guarantee sterility is shown in the EPA manual on pages
198 and 199. Quality control of UV Units requires frequent
monitoring with a shortwave UV meter and at least quarterly
measurement of effectivness on a coliform culture. The
manual states, "UV-irradiated plates should show 99%
reduction in the count of the control plate. If count
reduction is less than 80%, replace lamp." Further, users of
UV units should be aware of the safety hazards attendant to
their use.
The special media we use for culturing fecal coliform and
fecal streptococci promote the growth of the microorganisms
we are seeking and inhibit or kill all others. This is why
we can get away with performing filtrations in the field
under grossly unsanitary conditions. This tolerance of the
media however, must not be abused. We must assure that our
glassware and everything else that we can control, that comes
in contact with the sample, is sterile--not almost sterile.
If cost of multiple stainless steel filtration units is a
problem, Districts can use the polycarbonate plastic units
made by Nalgene and other companies. They can be autoclaved
and sealed in kraft paper bags, used once at the field site,
and returned to the laboratory for autoclaving. They are
cheap enough that dozens can be taken on an extended field
trip if necessary.
The sampling and analytical methods described in our TWRI's
are the methods currently approved for use in obtaining data
that will be placed in WATSTORE. Our data users, both within
and outside the Survey, have a right to expect that the
methods we say we use in obtaining data are the methods
we actually use.
David A. Rickert
Acting Chief, Quality of Water Branch
Distribution: A, B, FO, PO
This memorandum does not supersede any other memorandum