MODFLOW-2000 model used to illustrate the differences in flow paths and travel times when three-dimensional kriging is used to estimate the hydraulic conductivity distribution as compared to manual determinations of hydraulic conductivity distribution
Dates
Release Date
2018-01-01
Start Date
1979-05-01
End Date
1979-06-30
Publication Date
2023-09-15
Citation
Arihood, L.D., 2018, MODFLOW-2000 model used to illustrate the differences in flow paths and travel times when three-dimensional kriging is used to estimate the hydraulic conductivity distribution as compared to manual determinations of hydraulic conductivity distribution: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/F7QN65RW.
Summary
A three-dimensional (3D) groundwater flow model of the glaciated sediments around Elkhart, Indiana was constructed as part of the U.S. Geological Survey Groundwater Resources Program using lithologic records from water well logs. Texture-based hydraulic conductivities were assigned to vertical intervals along each lithology record. A three-dimensional kriging program read texture-based hydraulic conductivity values for each vertical interval and calculated a continuous 3D distribution of hydraulic conductivity for the entire model domain. The model was calibrated to hydrologic conditions in May and June of 1979. The model was used to simulate groundwater flow paths from points of recharge to points of discharge. These flow paths were [...]
Summary
A three-dimensional (3D) groundwater flow model of the glaciated sediments around Elkhart, Indiana was constructed as part of the U.S. Geological Survey Groundwater Resources Program using lithologic records from water well logs. Texture-based hydraulic conductivities were assigned to vertical intervals along each lithology record. A three-dimensional kriging program read texture-based hydraulic conductivity values for each vertical interval and calculated a continuous 3D distribution of hydraulic conductivity for the entire model domain. The model was calibrated to hydrologic conditions in May and June of 1979. The model was used to simulate groundwater flow paths from points of recharge to points of discharge. These flow paths were compared to flow paths generated by an existing model (https://pubs.usgs.gov/wri/1997/4204/report.pdf) that was constructed using a manual approach to create the hydraulic conductivity distribution and calibrated to the same hydrologic conditions. The model using the kriged hydraulic conductivity distribution had 30 vertically discretized layers, and the model using the the manually created hydraulic conductivity distribution had two vertically discretized layers. This USGS data release contains the model input and output files for the simulations described in the associated documentation report (https://doi.org/10.3133/sir2019-5088)
Arihood, L.D., Lampe, D.C., Bayless, E.R., and Brown, S.E., 2019, Comparison of groundwater-model construction methods, representations of glacial geology, model designs, and groundwater-model flow simulations within Elkhart County, Indiana: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report, https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20195088.
The purpose of this study was to examine differences in model simulations resulting from using two model-construction approaches. Model accuracy, computed water budget, and simulated flow paths from a model using a new construction technique were compared to those of an existing model to determine if the new construction technique resulted in more accurate simulations. The development of the model input and output files included in this data release are documented in U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2019-5088 (https://doi.org/10.3313/sir2019-5088)
Preview Image
Image of the model domain and the active area of the model