![]()
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH GRANT PROPOSAL
Project ID: 2005CO115B
Title: Colorado's Evolving Irrigated Agriculture: Economic Accounting Impact Analysis
Project Type: Research
Start Date: 03/01/2006
End Date: 02/28/2007
Congressional District: 4th
Focus Category: Economics, Agriculture
Keywords: Arkansas River, Republican River, Rio Grand River, South Platte River
Principal Investigator: Waskom, Reagan M. (Colorado State University)
Federal Funds: $16,800
Non-Federal Matching Funds: $8,586
Abstract: Agricultural industry is asignificant economic sector in Colorado. Farming employed roughly 45,000 people in 2000. Seventy-five percent of the total value of Colorado crops is derived from the irrigated sector, highlighting the importance of, and dependence on, a secure water supply. Colorado's crop production supports commercial livestock, meat-packing and dairy industries. Each primary agricultural industrial sector encourages economic development directly, through the purchase of inputs, and indirectly, through the wages and salaries of employees. Rural to urban water transfers can create contentious and emotionally charged discussions which often center on the economic health of rural communities and their dependence on irrigated agriculture. The next greatest changes in agricultural water use are expected to occur in the Front Range as Municipal and Industrial (M & I) growth moves into agricultural lands and/or as water is transferred from agriculture to support growth. Water transfer will alter the economic and natural resource environment of rural Colorado, presenting a key challenge for all Coloradans. Without other viable local base industries to generate revenues and provide employment, a reduction in the revenue generated in the agricultural sector will have adverse economic impacts throughout the regional economy. Impacts will be felt by businesses and by local governments whose property and sales tax base is eroded. Clearly, it is important to quantify and describe the economic shock of irrigated agriculture's reduction, to disaggregate the shock among different industries in the region and among households according to their income, and to determine how government revenues might shrink. This information will be valuable to many water stakeholders including farmers, businesses, water supply administrators, and regional leaders charged with economic development. A rigorous economic accounting will approximate the economic impacts of reduced irrigated acres. Analysis will be focused on four basins (Arkansas, Republican, Rio Grande, South Platte).
Specific objectives include:
Progress/Completion Report, PDF