National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) Program
Go to:
Overview
This study examines the relation between varying
levels of urban intensity in drainage basins and in-stream water
quality, measured by physical, chemical, and biological factors
in 11 metropolitan areas. For each metropolitan study area, stream
sites are located in 28-30 basins that have minimal natural variability
among them and represent a gradient of urban development intensity.
In this study, in-stream water quality is considered a composite of physical, chemical, and biological characteristics that are influenced by natural factors and by human activities; and, biological communities reflect the integration of these influences.
Map and description of individual study areas
Site selection process:
• Identified similarly sized basins in
the study area (basin delineation).
• Assembled basin characterization information (land cover,
infrastructure, socioeconomic variables, population, and so on).
• Calculated urban intensity index (UII) to rank sites along
a gradient of urbanization.
• Identified an area with minimum natural variability (climate,
elevation, ecoregion, etc.)
• Conducted site reconnaissance to assess site suitability
for sampling.
• Recalculated information on basin characteristics based
on sampling locations.
• Selected final sites that are distributed on the gradient
of low to high urbanization.
Representing urban intensity: Urban Intensity
Index (UII)
• The urban intensity of each basin is
measured using an index that integrates information about the multiple
dimensions of human influence on the urban landscape at the drainage
basin scale.
• The UII is a multimetric index based on population, infrastructure,
land cover, and socioeconomic factors correlated with changes in
population density (McMahon and Cuffney, 2000). Some of the variables
used in the index may also be important factors for explaining variations
in water quality.
Determining variables to be included in the
Urban Intensity Index
• Assemble the GIS-derived variables used
to characterize population, socioeconomic, infrastructure, and land
cover variables for each basin in the study area.
• Run correlation of individual variables with 2000 population
density.
• Variables correlated with population density are adjusted
to represent a range of urban intensity from 0-100 over all sites
within a study area.
What "urban" looks like in each study area -- see “Where we studied”
Controlling natural variability
• For each study area, basins were located
primarily in a single ecoregion (see table below) to control variability
in natural factors that influence water-quality, while allowing
the degree of urbanization to vary among study basins.
Overview and sampling protocols for data
Reference:
McMahon, Gerard and Cuffney, T.F., 2000,
Quantifying urban intensity in drainage basins for assessing stream
ecological conditions: Journal of the American Water Resources Association,
v. 36, p. 1247-1261. http://water.usgs.gov/nawqa/ecology/pubs/index.html
| Predominant USEPA Level III ecoregions* where basins were located in different study areas. | |
| STUDY AREA | PREDOMINANT ECOREGION |
| East Coast: | |
| Atlanta, Georgia | Piedmont |
| Birmingham, Alabama | Valley and Ridge |
| Boston, Massachusetts | NE Coastal Zone |
| Raleigh, North Carolina | Piedmont |
| Great Lakes Region: | |
| Milwaukee-Green Bay, Wisconsin | Southeastern Wisconsin Till |
| South Central: | |
| Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas | Texas Blackland Prairies |
| Mountain West: | |
| Denver, Colorado | Western High Plains |
| Salt Lake City, Utah | Central Basin and Range |
| West Coast: | |
| Portland, Oregon | Willamette Valley |
| Seattle, Washington | Puget Lowland |
*United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2000, Level III ecoregions of the continental United States: Corvallis, Oregon, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Map M-1, various scales.