Monitoring the Water Quality of the Nation's Large Rivers

Mississippi River Basin NASQAN Program

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) has monitored water quality in the Mississippi River Basin as part of the National Stream Quality Accounting Network (NASQAN) since 1995, applying a basinwide perspective to understanding water quality on a regional scale (Hooper and others, 1997). The objectives of the Mississippi River Basin NASQAN Program are to provide an ongoing characterization of the concentrations and mass fluxes of sediment and chemicals at key locations in the basin, to determine regional source areas for these materials, and to assess the effect of human influences on observed concentrations and fluxes. NASQAN complements the ongoing USGS National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) Program, which is performing a detailed assessment in 23 subbasins within the Mississippi River Basin (Hirsch and others, 1988). NASQAN monitors the large rivers in the Mississippi River Basin, downstream of NAWQA study units. NASQAN, in conjunction with NAWQA, can provide the data and information needed by other USGS programs, Federal and State agencies, other segments of the scientific community, and by the public to address the present and future status of water quality in the Mississippi River Basin.

Environmental Setting

The Mississippi River Basin, which drains about 41 percent of the conterminous United States, is the largest river basin in North America (fig.1). It is the third largest river basin in the world, smaller than only the Amazon River Basin in South America and the Congo River Basin in Africa. More than 72 million people reside in the Mississippi River Basin. In addition, the Mississippi River Basin contains one of the most productive farming regions in the world which produces the majority of the corn, soybeans, wheat, cattle, and hogs, as well as a significant amount of the cotton and rice grown in the United States. Furthermore, the majority of all pesticides and fertilizers used in the United States are applied to cropland in the Mississippi River Basin. As a result of rainfall runoff and ground-water discharge, streams in the Mississippi River Basin carry suspended sediment, naturally occurring chemicals weathered from the soil, and contaminants from human activities. These streams, and much of the dissolved and suspended material in them, eventually flow into the Mississippi River and ultimately are discharged to the Gulf of Mexico. The water quality of the Mississippi River and its tributaries is an important regional and national issue. The land use and cultural changes that have occurred in the Mississippi River Basin in the 1900's have had measurable effects on the quality of water in the Mississippi River Basin. Because changes in land use and water quality likely will continue to occur in the Mississippi River Basin as agriculture production increases in response to the growing worldwide demand for food and fiber, it is important that a long-term program of monitoring, data analysis, interpretation, and reporting be implemented for the Mississippi River Basin.

Sampling in the Mississippi River Basin

Bridge sampling on Platte River near Louisville, Nebraska. (R.H. Coupe, photo)

Bridge sampling on Platte River near Louisville, Nebraska. (R.H. Coupe, photo)

Cableway sampling on Missouri River near Pierre, South Dakota. (R.H. Coupe, photo)

Cableway sampling on Missouri River near Pierre, South Dakota. (R.H. Coupe, photo)

Boat sampling on Missouri River near Omaha, Nebraska. (R.H. Coupe, photo)

Boat sampling on Missouri River near Omaha, Nebraska. (R.H. Coupe, photo)

Measuring Mass Flux

The choice of measuring mass flux (the amount of material that passes a set point) as the primary objective in the NASQAN program requires a relatively high sampling frequency. Additionally, the emphasis on flux characterization dictates that more samples must be collected during periods of higher streamflow.

The flux-based approach allows for the treatment of a river network as an integrated system. This approach provides data to describe and compare yields of non-point source contaminants across large regional basins, calculate loads to receiving waters, including off-continent flux, and test regional models of the influence of land use on water quality.

Figure 1. The Mississippi River Basin and the location of NAWQA study units.

Figure 1. The Mississippi River Basin and the location of NAWQA study units.

 Figure 2.  Subbasins defined by NASQAN stations

Figure 2. Subbasins defined by NASQAN stations

Station Selection

Eighteen NASQAN sampling stations (fig. 2, table 1) were selected at critical junctures within the Mississippi River Basin to provide the essential framework for understanding fluxes of materials within the basin and to the Gulf of Mexico. An important consideration for station selection was the influence of varying land use, the presence of major reservoirs, and input from major tributaries. Generally, stations were selected where significant changes in mass flux were expected, such as at confluences of major tributaries or at the downstream end of major reservoirs.

Table 1: Description of NASQAN sampling stations in the Mississippi River Basin
[Mean discharge: From 1980 to 1996, mi2, square miles; ft3/s, cubic feet per second]
Map
no.
Sampling station Drainage
area
(mi2)
Mean discharge
(ft3/s)
Incremental increase in drainage area
(mi2)
Incremental
increase in streamflow
(ft3/s)

Mississippi River Basin above Missouri River

1 Mississippi R. at Clinton, IA 85,600 56,300 85,600 56,300
2 Mississippi River at Grafton, IL 171,300 130,200 85,700 73,900

 Missouri River Basin

3 Yellowstone River near Sydney, MT 69,100 11,090 69,100 11,090
4 Missouri River near Culbertson, MT 91,600 9,500 91,600 9,500
5 Missouri River below Garrison Dam, ND 181,400 19,600 20,700 -990
6 Missouri River at Pierre, SD 243,500 23,700 62,100 4,100
7 Missouri River at Omaha, NE 322,800 35,800 79,300 12,100
8 Platte River at Louisville, NE 85,800 8,800 85,800 8,800
9 Missouri River at Hermann, MO 524,200 98,100 115,600 53,500

Mississippi River Basin below the Missouri River and the
Mississippi River at Grafton

10 Mississippi River at Thebes, IL 713,200 243,400 17,700 15,100

Ohio River Basin

11 Ohio River at Greenup, KY 62,000 88,600 62,000  88,600
12 Ohio River at Cannelton Dam, KY 97,000 127,800 35,000 39,200
13 Wabash River at New Harmony, IN 29,200 31,300* 29,200 31,300
14 Tennessee River at Paducah, KY 40,300 60,400 40,300 60,400
15 Ohio River at Grand Chain, IL 203,000 295,900 37,100 76,400

Lower Mississippi River

16 Arkansas River at David Terry Dam, below Little Rock, AR 158,300 51,100 158,300 51,100
17 Atchafalaya River at Melville, LA 93,300# 233,000& 93,300 varies
18 Mississippi River near
St. Francisville, LA
1,125,300 543,400 50,800 varies
*Discharge from the Wabash at Mt. Carmel, IN
# Excludes contribution from Mississippi River Basin
&Includes Mississippi River Diversion.

Sampling Strategy

The chemical constituents measured in the NASQAN Program (table 2) include 47 water-soluble pesticides, suspended and dissolved trace elements, major ions, nutrients, carbon, and suspended sediment. Samples are collected from 6 to 15 times per year. The number of samples collected at each station reflects the overall importance of that station to the flux or the predicated variability in water quality. For example, those stations downstream of major reservoirs are not sampled as often as others because the long residence times in the reservoirs result in the water being thoroughly mixed, thus dampening any seasonal effects.

Table 2: Constituents measured in the NASQAN program
Measurement Class  Examples
Suspended sediment Concentration of fine and coarse sediment particles
Pesticides Common water-soluble pesticides, including atrazine and metalochlor
Suspended and dissolved trace elements Lead, cadmium, copper, and zinc
Carbon Dissolved and suspended organic carbon; dissolved inorganic carbon
Nutrients Total and dissolved nitrogen and phosphorus
Major Ions Calcium, sulfate, and chloride
Support Variables Stream discharge, temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, conductivity

Water Quality Issues

The climate, land use, soils, physiography, and population vary widely across the Mississippi River Basin. The annual runoff ranges from less than 2 inches per year in the western part of the basin to more than 50 inches per year in the southeastern part. Most of the fertilizer and pesticides used in the United States are applied to cropland in a 10-state area known as the corn belt (all or part of Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, Ohio, South Dakota, and Wisconsin).This area is used primarily for cropland and produces most of the corn, soybeans, wheat, and sorghum grown in the United States. In some drainage basins, particularly in Iowa, Illinois, and Indiana, more than 50 percent of all land is used for growing crops. Large numbers of livestock and poultry also are produced in the central part of the basin (Battaglin and Goolsby, 1995). Furthermore, most of the basin's population of 72 million people reside in the eastern half of the basin. Contaminants, including sediment, nitrogen, phosphorus, pesticides, trace elements, industrial organic compounds, and sewage, originate from these many different uses of land and can have substantial effects on water quality in the Mississippi River Basin and the Gulf of Mexico (Goolsby and others, 1997; Meade, 1995).

Floods in the Mississippi River Basin
Mississippi  River at St. Louis on July 30, 1993

Mississippi River at St. Louis on July 30, 1993. Lighter brown colors indicate areas of higher suspended sediment. (Strenco Photography, used with permission)

Wabash River flooding in the spring of 1997

Wabash River flooding in the spring of 1997. (G.K. McCombs, photo)

Overflow of the Missouri River in 1997 on  Route 19 near Hermann,
      Missouri

Overflow of the Missouri River in 1997 on Route 19 near Hermann, Missouri. (R.R. Holmes, photo)

Examples of questions to be addressed by NASQAN

Specific questions that can be answered by NASQAN data in the Mississippi River Basin include the following:

The Missouri River near Culbertson, Montana

The Missouri River near Culbertson, Montana. (R.H. Coupe, photo)

Preliminary Results

Fluxes of total nitrogen and total phosphorus for 1995 and 1996 from the Mississippi River Basin into the Gulf of Mexico show a distinct seasonality (fig. 3), corresponding with spring rains in the basin and the annual application of fertilizers to agricultural lands. The fluxes of total nitrogen and total phosphorus are similar in distribution, although the total nitrogen peaks are sharper, and are controlled by flow. Disproportionately large quantities of total nitrogen and total phosphorus discharging into the Gulf of Mexico originate in the Upper Mississippi and the Ohio River Basins. The two subbasins contribute approximately 75 percent of the annual total nitrogen flux and 61 percent of the annual total phosphorus flux to the Gulf of Mexico (fig. 4). Yet these two basins together only represent 32 percent of the drainage area in the Mississippi River Basin and 52 percent of the annual flow of the Mississippi River into the Gulf of Mexico. Further subdivision would be possible using data from all 18 NASQAN stations and would further identify source areas for these constituents.

Figure 3. Total nitrogen (A), total phosphorus
(B), and flow (C), discharged to the Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi
and Atchafalaya Rivers in 1995 and 1996.

Figure 3. Total nitrogen (A), total phosphorus (B), and flow (C), discharged to the Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi and Atchafalaya Rivers in 1995 and 1996.

Figure 4.</b> Percent flux of total nitrogen and total phosphorus into the Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi
and Atchafalaya Rivers by subbasin, 1995-96

Figure 4. Percent flux of total nitrogen and total phosphorus into the Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi and Atchafalaya Rivers by subbasin, 1995-96

National NASQAN Program

The Mississippi River Basin NASQAN Program is part of a national program that was redesigned in 1995 to focus on monitoring water quality in four of the Nation's largest rivers-the Mississippi (including the Missouri and Ohio), the Colorado, the Columbia, and the Rio Grande. In these four basins, the USGS currently operates a network of 40 NASQAN stations, and applies a consistent flux-based approach to characterize the transport of selected chemicals through the river systems.

Products of the NASQAN Program

Data from the NASQAN Program are published annually in USGS data reports issued by each State in the network. Additionally, NASQAN data are being released electronically on the World Wide Web (http://water.usgs.gov/nasqan), and flux estimates for selected constituents at NASQAN stations will be published periodically.

References Cited

Battaglin, W.A., and Goolsby, D.A., 1995, Spatial data in geographic information system format on agricultural chemical use, land use, and cropping practices in the United States: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 94-4176, 87 p.

Goolsby, D.A., Battaglin, W.A., and Hooper, R.P., 1997, Sources and transport of nitrogen in the Mississippi River Basin: online at: http://co.water.usgs.gov/midconherb/html/st.louis.hypoxia.html.

Hirsch, R.M., Alley, W.M., and Wilber, W.G., 1988, Concepts for a national water-quality assessment program: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1021, 42 p.

Hooper, R.P., Goolsby, D.A., Rickert, D.A., and McKenzie, S.W., 1997, NASQAN-A program to monitor the water quality of the Nation's large Rivers: U.S. Geological Survey Factsheet FS-055-97, 6 p.

Meade, R.H., 1995, Contaminants in the Mississippi River: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1133, 140 p.


For further information, contact:
Chief, Office of Water Quality
U.S. Geological Survey
National Center, Mail Stop 412
12201 Sunrise Valley Drive
Reston, VA 20192

by Richard H. Coupe Jr., and Donald A. Goolsby. Layout by Mark V. Bonito

USGS Home NASQAN Home Contact Us Related Links NASQAN Intranet

Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices

Take Pride in America logo USA.gov logo U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
URL: http://water.usgs.gov/nasqan
Page Contact Information: nasqan_whq@usgs.gov
Page Last Modified: Tuesday, 15-Dec-2009 13:40 CDT