Adams, Gregory P. Runkle, Donna Rea, Alan Becker, Carol J. 1997 1.0 map Open-File Report 96-448 Reston, VA U.S. Geological Survey http://water.usgs.gov/lookup/getspatial?ofr96-448_cond This data set consists of digital polygons of a constant hydraulic conductivity value for the alluvial and terrace deposits along the North Canadian River from Oklahoma City to Eufaula Lake in east-central Oklahoma. Ground water in 710 square miles of Quaternary-age alluvial and terrace deposits along the North Canadian River is an important source of water for irrigation, industrial, municipal, stock, and domestic supplies. The aquifer, composed of alluvial and terrace deposits, consists of sand, silt, clay, and gravel. The aquifer is underlain and in hydraulic connection with the upper zone of the Permian-age Garber-Wellington aquifer and the Pennsylvanian-age Ada-Vamoosa aquifer. Some of the polygon boundaries were digitized from a published ground-water modeling report about the aquifer and some lines were extracted from published digital geology data sets. The constant hydraulic conductivity value for the aquifer was estimated as 310 feet per day in the published ground-water modeling report. Ground-water flow models are numerical representations that simplify and aggregate natural systems. Models are not unique; different combinations of aquifer characteristics may produce similar results. Therefore, values of hydraulic conductivity used in the model and presented in this data set are not precise, but are within a reasonable range when compared to independently collected data. This data set was created for a project to develop data sets to support ground-water vulnerability analysis. The objective was to create and document a digital geospatial data set from a published report or map, or existing digital geospatial data sets, that could be used in ground-water vulnerability analysis. Introduction -- This data set consists of digital polygons of a constant hydraulic conductivity value for the alluvial and terrace deposits along the North Canadian River from Oklahoma City to Eufaula Lake in east-central Oklahoma. Ground water in 710 square miles of Quaternary-age alluvial and terrace deposits along the North Canadian River is an important source of water for irrigation, industrial, municipal, stock, and domestic supplies. The aquifer, composed of alluvial and terrace deposits, consists of sand, silt, clay, and gravel. The aquifer is underlain and in hydraulic connection with the upper zone of the Permian-age Garber-Wellington aquifer and the Pennsylvanian-age Ada-Vamoosa aquifer. Other Permian and Pennsylvanian-age rocks underlying the alluvial and terrace deposits have low permeabilities and are not in hydraulic connection with the alluvial and terrace aquifer (Havens, 1989). The constant hydraulic conductivity value and some of the polygon boundaries are from a ground-water modeling report published by the U.S. Geological Survey entitled, "Geohydrology of the alluvial and terrace deposits of the North Canadian River from Oklahoma City to Eufaula Lake, central Oklahoma," by Havens (1989, p. 22 and pl. 6). Other polygon boundaries were extracted from digital surficial geology data sets by Cederstrand (1996a, 1996b) based on a scale of 1:250,000 and digitized from a paper-base map by Havens (1989, plate 6), also at a scale of 1:250,000. Hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer was estimated to be 310 feet per day by Havens (1989, p. 22) and was assumed to be uniform throughout the aquifer. Digital Line Graph (DLG) format requires numbers to be stored as integers. Therefore, the hydraulic conductivity in feet per day was multiplied by 10 and stored in the digital data sets as tenths of a foot per day. For example 310 feet per day was multiplied by 10 and stored in the digital data sets as 3100 tenths of a foot per day. Permian outcrops and parts of the aquifer that were not included in the ground-water model were given a value -99999 to indicate the hydraulic conductivity is not known. Ground-water flow models are numerical representations that simplify and aggregate natural systems. Models are not unique; different combinations of aquifer characteristics may produce similar results. The hydraulic conductivity and recharge are closely interrelated. As long as these two model inputs are in balance the model has a small mean residual; it represents the natural system numerically. If the hydraulic conductivity is accurately known, the model can be used to accurately determine recharge. Likewise, if the hydraulic conductivity is poorly known, then the recharge will be poorly determined. Therefore, values of hydraulic conductivity used in the model and presented in this data set are not precise, but are within a reasonable range when compared to independently collected data. In most aquifers, hydraulic conductivity measurements made in wells or in cores will range over several orders of magnitude, even over short horizontal and vertical distances. Hydraulic conductivity values derived from ground-water flow models represent areal generalizations and do not reflect the large local variance in well or core measurements. Reviews Applied to Data -- This electronic report was subjected to the same review standard that applies to all U.S. Geological Survey reports. Reviewers were asked to check the topological consistency, tolerances, attribute frequencies and statistics, projection, and geographic extent. Reviewers were given digital data sets and paper plots for checking against the source maps to verify the linework and attributes. The reviewers checked the metadata and a_readme.1st files for completeness and accuracy. Related Spatial and Tabular Data Sets -- This data set is one of four digital map data sets being published together for this aquifer. The four data sets are: > aqbound - aquifer boundaries > cond - hydraulic conductivity > recharg - aquifer recharge > wlelev - water-level elevation contours Digital map data sets of the Oklahoma surficial geology digitized from 1:250,000-scale maps (or 1:125,000-scale maps for the three Oklahoma panhandle counties) are published separately. Other References Cited -- Cederstrand, J.R., 1996a, Digital geologic map of Fort Smith quadrangle, east-central Oklahoma: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 96-375, based on a scale of 1:250,000, 2 diskettes. (Available in nonproprietary and ARC/INFO formats.) URL:http://wwwok.cr.usgs.gov/gis/geology/index.html Cederstrand, J.R., 1996b, Digital geologic map of Oklahoma City quadrangle, central Oklahoma: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 96-378, based on a scale of 1:250,000, 2 diskettes. (Available in nonproprietary and ARC/INFO formats.) URL:http://wwwok.cr.usgs.gov/gis/geology/index.html Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. (ESRI), 1995, ARC/INFO Command Reference, ARC/INFO On-line manuals: Redlands, CA. Havens, J.S., 1989, Geohydrology of the alluvial and terrace deposits of the North Canadian River from Oklahoma City to Eufaula Lake, central Oklahoma: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 88-4234, 32 p., 12 pl. Notes -- Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this data set has been used by the U.S. Geological Survey, U.S. Department of the Interior, no warranty expressed or implied is made by the U.S. Geological Survey as to the accuracy of the data and related materials. The act of distribution shall not constitute any such warranty, and no responsibility is assumed by the U.S. Geological Survey in the use of this data, software, or related materials. 1989 publication date Complete None planned -97.7581 -95.6618 35.6147 35.0633 none ground-water vulnerability groundwater vulnerability aquifers ground water groundwater North Canadian alluvial and terrace aquifer alluvial and terrace aquifer terrace aquifer terrace alluvial aquifer alluvium hydraulic conductivity inlandWaters none east-central Oklahoma None. Lines representing aquifer boundaries, and therefore hydraulic conductivity boundaries, were extracted from digital geology data sets by Cederstrand (1996a, 1996b) based on a scale of 1:250,000. Some of the model-grid boundaries (Havens, 1989, plate 6) were digitized from a paper-base map with a maximum registration root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.0135 map inches (0.0053 map centimeters). Hydraulic conductivity polygons represented at this scale are indicative of broad, regional trends and should not be interpreted as site-specific. Ground-water flow models are numerical representations that simplify and aggregate natural systems. Models are not unique; different combinations of aquifer characteristics may produce similar results. The hydraulic conductivity and recharge are closely interrelated. As long as these two model inputs are in balance the model has a small mean residual; it represents the natural system numerically. If the hydraulic conductivity is accurately known, the model can be used to accurately determine recharge. Likewise, if the hydraulic conductivity is poorly known, then the recharge will be poorly determined. Therefore, values of hydraulic conductivity used in the model and presented in this data set are not precise, but are within a reasonable range when compared to independently collected data. In most aquifers, hydraulic conductivity measurements made in wells or in cores will range over several orders of magnitude, even over short horizontal and vertical distances. Hydraulic conductivity values derived from ground-water flow models represent areal generalizations and do not reflect the large local variance in well or core measurements. Donna L. Runkle U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologist mailing address

202 NW 66th St., Bldg. 7

Oklahoma City Oklahoma 73116 United States of America 1-888-275-8747 (405) 843-7712 dlrunkle@usgs.gov none http://water.usgs.gov/lookup/get?OFR96-448/browse.gif A browse image of the four aquifer data sets. GIF Compilation of this data set and the associated metadata was funded under a cooperative Joint Funding Agreement between the U.S. Geological Survey and the State of Oklahoma, Office of the Secretary of Environment. Public UNCLASSIFIED None Operating System-- UNIX, ARC/INFO Version 7.0.3,(Mon Mar 13 22:21:55 PST 1995) Cederstrand, Joel R. 1996 1.0 map Open-File Report 96-378 Oklahoma City, OK U.S. Geological Survey http://water.usgs.gov/lookup/getspatial?ofr96-448_cond Cederstrand, Joel R. 1996 1.0 map Open-File Report 96-375 Oklahoma City, OK U.S. Geological Survey http://wwwok.cr.usgs.gov/gis/geology/index.html Polygon and chain-node topology present. This data set includes all the areas of a specified hydraulic conductivity value reported by Havens (1989) on page 22 and plate 6 for the North Canadian alluvial and terrace deposits and were given a LSOURCE line attribute of 1. Some aquifer boundary lines are from Cederstrand (1996a, 1996b) and were given a value of 2 for the LSOURCE line attribute. The boundary lines by Cederstrand (1996a, 1996b) are more detailed and contain bedrock outcrops not shown by Havens (1989). None 64 meters Resolution as reported None. Lines representing polygon boundaries were extracted from digital geology data sets using the ARC/INFO GET command (ESRI, 1995) (use of trade names is for descriptive purposes only, and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government). 19960313 The ARC/INFO CLEAN command (ESRI, 1995) was used with a dangle length of 0.0 feet (0.0 meters) and fuzzy tolerance of 32.8 feet (10.0 meters). 19960313 A comparison of a paper plot of the report data set with the mylar-base source map showed that plates 1 and 6 from Havens (1989) were published at a scale of 1:251,400 and not 1:250,000. 19960522 Four tics were registered on a paper-source map (Havens, 1989, plate 6) and a few of the model-grid boundaries were digitized in one session with a maximum registration root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.0135 map inches (0.0053 map centimeters). The data was edited to delete extraneous pseudo and dangle nodes. The ARC/INFO CLEAN command (ESRI, 1995), was used with a dangle length of 82 feet (25 meters) and fuzzy tolerance of 246 feet (75 meters). 19960528 Lines were attributed for LSOURCE and polygons were attributed for K. Verification of attribute codes was made by comparing a paper plot of the report data set with the source maps. 19960528 Vector Point 164 String 503 GT-polygon composed of chains 165 Albers Conical Equal Area 29.5 45.5 -96 23 0.0 0.0 coordinate pair 64 meters 64 meters METERS North American Datum of 1983 Geodetic Reference System 80 6378137 298.257 COND.PAT Polygon attribute table ARC/INFO - Polygon attribute table ARC/INFO - n/a n/a AREA Area of polygon in square coverage units Computed Positive real numbers n/a n/a PERIMETER Perimeter of polygon in coverage units Computed Positive real numbers n/a n/a COND# Internal feature number Computed Sequential unique positive integer n/a n/a COND-ID User-assigned feature number User-defined Integer n/a n/a K Hydraulic conductivity in tenths of a foot per day Havens (1989) 3100, -99999 n/a n/a MINOR1 Blank item for DLG Calculated 0 n/a n/a MAJOR1 Hydraulic conductivity in tenths of a foot per day Havens (1989) 3100, -99999 n/a n/a COND.AAT Arc attribute table ARC/INFO - Arc attribute table ARC/INFO - n/a n/a FNODE# Internal number of from-node Computed Sequential unique positive integer n/a n/a TNODE# Internal number of to-node Computed Sequential unique positive integer n/a n/a LPOLY# Internal number of poly to left of arc Computed Sequential unique positive integer n/a n/a RPOLY# Internal number of poly to right of arc Computed Sequential unique positive integer n/a n/a LENGTH Length of arc in coverage units Computed Positive real numbers n/a n/a COND# Internal feature number Computed Sequential unique positive integer n/a n/a COND-ID User-assigned feature number User-defined Integer n/a n/a LSOURCE Source of line Cederstrand (1996a, 1996b), Havens (1989) 1,2 n/a n/a MINOR1 Blank item for DLG Calculated 0 n/a n/a MAJOR1 Source of line Cederstrand (1996a, 1996b), Havens (1989) 1,2 n/a n/a Each polygon in this data set has an associated attribute, K, containing a hydraulic conductivity value (Havens, 1989) expressed in tenths of a foot per day. The hydraulic conductivity of 310 feet per day is stored as a K value of 3100 tenths of a foot per day. Polygons in this data set that contain a K value of -99999 represent areas where the hydraulic conductivity value is not known. K is stored in the first major code (MAJOR1) and 0 is stored in the first minor code (MINOR1) for polygons in the Digital Line Graph (DLG) version of this data set. Each line in this digital data set has an associated attribute, LSOURCE, that contains a code to indicate the line source. A LSOURCE code of 1 indicates the line is from Havens (1989) and an LSOURCE code of 2 indicates the line was extracted from Cederstrand (1996a, 1996b). LSOURCE is stored in the first major code (MAJOR1) for lines, and 0 is stored in the first minor code (MINOR1) in the DLG version of this data set. See overview. U.S. Geological Survey Ask USGS - Water Webserver Team mailing

445 National Center

Reston VA 20192 1-888-275-8747 (1-888-ASK-USGS) http://answers.usgs.gov/cgi-bin/gsanswers?pemail=h2oteam&subject=GIS+Dataset+ofr96-448_cond Although this data set has been used by the U.S. Geological Survey, U.S. Department of the Interior, no warranty expressed or implied is made by the U.S. Geological Survey as to the accuracy of the data and related materials. The act of distribution shall not constitute any such warranty, and no responsibility is assumed by the U.S. Geological Survey in the use of this data, software, or related materials. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Export Full coverage zipped 1 http://water.usgs.gov/GIS/dsdl/ofr96-448_cond.e00.gz Other DLG file format zipped 1 http://water.usgs.gov/GIS/dsdl/ofr96-448_cond.dlg.gz None. This dataset is provided by USGS as a public service. 20041108 U.S. Geological Survey Ask USGS -- Water Webserver Team mailing

445 National Center

Reston VA 20192 1-888-275-8747 (1-888-ASK-USGS) http://answers.usgs.gov/cgi-bin/gsanswers?pemail=h2oteam&subject=GIS+Dataset+ofr96-448_cond FGDC Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata FGDC-STD-001-1998