<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="fgdc_classic.xsl"?>
<metadata xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://water.usgs.gov/GIS/metadata/usgswrd/fgdc-std-001-1998.xsd">
	<idinfo>
		<citation>
			<citeinfo>
				<origin>U.S. Geological Survey</origin>
				<pubdate>20050315</pubdate>
				<title>1970's Land use data refined with 1990 population data to indicate new residential development for the conterminous United States</title>
				<edition>Version 1</edition>
				<geoform>digital data</geoform>
				<pubinfo>
                   <pubplace>Reston, VA</pubplace>
                   <publish>U.S. Geological Survey</publish>
                </pubinfo>
				<onlink>http://water.usgs.gov/lookup/getspatial?newlu90g</onlink>
				<lworkcit>
			<citeinfo>
				<origin>Hitt, Kerie J</origin>
				<pubdate>1976</pubdate>
				<title>1970's Land use data refined with 1990 population data to indicate new residential development for the conterminous United States</title>
				<geoform>map</geoform>
				<serinfo>
				<sername>U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Investigations Atlas</sername>
				<issue></issue>
				</serinfo>
				<pubinfo>
				<pubplace>Reston, VA</pubplace>
				<publish>U.S. Geological Survey</publish>
				</pubinfo>
				<othercit></othercit>
					</citeinfo>
				</lworkcit>
			</citeinfo>
		</citation>
		<descript>
		<abstract>This data set represents U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)
historical Land Use and Land Cover (LULC) from the 1970&apos;s that
has been refined with 1990 population density at the block group
level to indicate new residential development representative of
the 1990&apos;s.  Any area having a population density of at least
1,000 people per square mile had been re-classified as &quot;urban&quot;
land in this data set.
</abstract>
			<purpose>This is one of the ancillary GIS (geographic information system)
data layers developed to characterize USGS National
Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) sampling sites and study areas
for national synthesis of water-quality data.  For background on
the design of the NAWQA program see Gilliom and others (1995).
</purpose>
			<supplinf>This data set was developed by the NAWQA program to fill a
requirement for a nationally consistent land-use data base that
would define where &quot;urban&quot; land existed during the 1990&apos;s and
where urbanization had occurred from the 1970&apos;s to the 1990&apos;s.

The best available nationally consistent land-use data base
available at the time (1992) was the LULC data that was
developed by USGS under the Land Use Data Analysis (LUDA)
program in the 1970&apos;s-1980&apos;s.  LULC maps were delineated
manually from aerial photography, and LULC codes were assigned
using a hierarchical land use and land cover classification
scheme described by Anderson and others (1976). The maps were
published by quadrangles at scales of 1:250,000 and 1:100,000
(USGS, 1990).  The native digital format of the USGS LULC data
is Geographic Information Retrieval and Analysis System (GIRAS).

In 1992, a similar nationally consistent LULC data base for the
1990&apos;s did not exist.  NAWQA&apos;s approach was to take the 1970&apos;s
LULC data as a base and then enhance it with more current, more
detailed ancillary information on population (Hitt, 1994).

NAWQA developed a classification scheme for defining
&quot;residential&quot; land use based on population density.  The
classification scheme determined &quot;residential&quot; land as any area
with population density of at least 1,000 people per square mile
(386 people per square kilometer).

The procedure to refine the LULC data was to overlay the 1970&apos;s
land use with 1990 population density by block group.  Any area
in the derivative product that met the following criteria was
re-assigned a new land use code of &quot;new residential:&quot; (1)
original LULC land use was not urban or built-up, (2) original
LULC land use was not water, and (3) 1990 population density was
at least 1,000 people per square mile.

The ArcInfo Workstation grid is stored in the newlu90g.tgz file
(gzipped tar file).  The uncompressed file size of newlu90g.tar
is about 109 MB.  Ways to extract the grid from the .tgz archive
file include TARARC, Winzip, UnStuffIt, or the following GNU
utilities for WIN32:

gunzip newlu90g.tgz
tar xvof newlu90g.tar

The grid &quot;newlu90g&quot; will be in a subdirectory called arctar00000.

arctar00000/
arctar00000/info/
arctar00000/info/arc.dir
arctar00000/info/arc0000.dat
arctar00000/info/arc0000.nit
arctar00000/info/arc0001.dat
arctar00000/info/arc0001.nit
arctar00000/info/arc0002.dat
arctar00000/info/arc0002.nit
arctar00000/info/arc0002r.001
arctar00000/log
arctar00000/newlu90g/
arctar00000/newlu90g/dblbnd.adf
arctar00000/newlu90g/hdr.adf
arctar00000/newlu90g/log
arctar00000/newlu90g/prj.adf
arctar00000/newlu90g/sta.adf
arctar00000/newlu90g/vat.adf
arctar00000/newlu90g/w001001.adf
arctar00000/newlu90g/w001001x.adf
arctar00000/newlu90g.aux

Related_Spatial_and_Tabular_Data_Sets:

The data set is provided as a GeoTIFF image (newlu90g.tif is
contained in newlu90g.tar.gz) as well as native ArcInfo
Workstation GRID format (newlu90g.tgz).  The GeoTIFF file is
provided as a nonproprietary format in case the user&apos;s software
cannot access the data in ArcInfo Workstation GRID format. The
uncompressed GeoTIFF file size is 1348131109 bytes.

The following table describes the index values stored in an
embedded color map in the GeoTIFF image:

 Index    RGB Values
 Value     R   G   B
-----------------------------------------------------------------
 0         no data
10        255  20 147
11        255   0 255
12        255   0   0
13        208  32 144
14        255 105 180
15        255 192 203
16        238 130 238
17        255 228 225
21        255 215   0
22        255 255   0
23        255 140   0
24        238 221 130
31        255 250 205
32        244 164 96
33        218 165 32
41        152 251 152
42          0 255   0
43        124 252   0
51        135 206 250
52          0 191 255
53          0 255 255
54        175 238 238
61        127 255 212
62         72 209 204
71        233 150 122
72        184 134  11
73        210 180 140
74        165  42  42
75        188 143 143
76        139  69  19
77        143 188 143
81        218 112 214
82        123 104 238
83        138  43 226
84          0   0 205
85        160  32 240
91        211 211 211
92        105 105 105

The newlu90g.aux (auxiliary) file archived with the .tif file
stores coordinate system information for the .tif file and is
recognized by ArcGIS.

The newlu90g.clr (colormap) file specifies the colors to be used
for displaying ArcInfo Workstation grid cell values.  This is an
ascii file containing the index numbers 0-255 followed by RGB
values:

Index      -- RGB Values ---
Value      red  green   blue
(LULC
code)
----------------------------
# value red green blue
  0 30 30 30
  1 30 30 30
  2 30 30 30
  3 30 30 30
  4 30 30 30
  5 30 30 30
  6 30 30 30
  7 30 30 30
  8 30 30 30
  9 30 30 30
 10 255 20 147
 11 255 0 255
 12 255 0 0
 13 208 32 144
 14 255 105 180
 15 255 192 203
 16 238 130 238
 17 255 228 225
 18 30 30 30
 19 30 30 30
 20 30 30 30
 21 255 215 0
 22 255 255 0
 23 255 140 0
 24 238 221 130
 25 30 30 30
 26 30 30 30
 27 30 30 30
 28 30 30 30
 29 30 30 30
 30 30 30 30
 31 255 250 205
 32 244 164 96
 33 218 165 32
 34 30 30 30
 35 30 30 30
 36 30 30 30
 37 30 30 30
 38 30 30 30
 39 30 30 30
 40 30 30 30
 41 152 251 152
 42 0 255 0
 43 124 252 0
 44 30 30 30
 45 30 30 30
 46 30 30 30
 47 30 30 30
 48 30 30 30
 49 30 30 30
 50 30 30 30
 51 135 206 250
 52 0 191 255
 53 0 255 255
 54 175 238 238
 55 30 30 30
 56 30 30 30
 57 30 30 30
 58 30 30 30
 59 30 30 30
 60 30 30 30
 61 127 255 212
 62 72 209 204
 63 30 30 30
 64 30 30 30
 65 30 30 30
 66 30 30 30
 67 30 30 30
 68 30 30 30
 69 30 30 30
 70 30 30 30
 71 233 150 122
 72 184 134 11
 73 210 180 140
 74 165 42 42
 75 188 143 143
 76 139 69 19
 77 143 188 143
 78 30 30 30
 79 30 30 30
 80 30 30 30
 81 218 112 214
 82 123 104 238
 83 138 43 226
 84 0 0 205
 85 160 32 240
 86 30 30 30
 87 30 30 30
 88 30 30 30
 89 30 30 30
 90 30 30 30
 91 211 211 211
 92 105 105 105
 93 30 30 30
 94 30 30 30
 95 30 30 30
 96 30 30 30
 97 30 30 30
 98 30 30 30
 99 30 30 30
100 30 30 30
101 30 30 30
102 30 30 30
103 30 30 30
104 30 30 30
105 30 30 30
106 30 30 30
107 30 30 30
108 30 30 30
109 30 30 30
110 30 30 30
111 30 30 30
112 30 30 30
113 30 30 30
114 30 30 30
115 30 30 30
116 30 30 30
117 30 30 30
118 30 30 30
119 30 30 30
120 30 30 30
121 30 30 30
122 30 30 30
123 30 30 30
124 30 30 30
125 30 30 30
126 30 30 30
127 30 30 30
128 30 30 30
129 30 30 30
130 30 30 30
131 30 30 30
132 30 30 30
133 30 30 30
134 30 30 30
135 30 30 30
136 30 30 30
137 30 30 30
138 30 30 30
139 30 30 30
140 30 30 30
141 30 30 30
142 30 30 30
143 30 30 30
144 30 30 30
145 30 30 30
146 30 30 30
147 30 30 30
148 30 30 30
149 30 30 30
150 30 30 30
151 30 30 30
152 30 30 30
153 30 30 30
154 30 30 30
155 30 30 30
156 30 30 30
157 30 30 30
158 30 30 30
159 30 30 30
160 30 30 30
161 30 30 30
162 30 30 30
163 30 30 30
164 30 30 30
165 30 30 30
166 30 30 30
167 30 30 30
168 30 30 30
169 30 30 30
170 30 30 30
171 30 30 30
172 30 30 30
173 30 30 30
174 30 30 30
175 30 30 30
176 30 30 30
177 30 30 30
178 30 30 30
179 30 30 30
180 30 30 30
181 30 30 30
182 30 30 30
183 30 30 30
184 30 30 30
185 30 30 30
186 30 30 30
187 30 30 30
188 30 30 30
189 30 30 30
190 30 30 30
191 30 30 30
192 30 30 30
193 30 30 30
194 30 30 30
195 30 30 30
196 30 30 30
197 30 30 30
198 30 30 30
199 30 30 30
200 30 30 30
201 30 30 30
202 30 30 30
203 30 30 30
204 30 30 30
205 30 30 30
206 30 30 30
207 30 30 30
208 30 30 30
209 30 30 30
210 30 30 30
211 30 30 30
212 30 30 30
213 30 30 30
214 30 30 30
215 30 30 30
216 30 30 30
217 30 30 30
218 30 30 30
219 30 30 30
220 30 30 30
221 30 30 30
222 30 30 30
223 30 30 30
224 30 30 30
225 30 30 30
226 30 30 30
227 30 30 30
228 30 30 30
229 30 30 30
230 30 30 30
231 30 30 30
232 30 30 30
233 30 30 30
234 30 30 30
235 30 30 30
236 30 30 30
237 30 30 30
238 30 30 30
239 30 30 30
240 30 30 30
241 30 30 30
242 30 30 30
243 30 30 30
244 30 30 30
245 30 30 30
246 30 30 30
247 30 30 30
248 30 30 30
249 30 30 30
250 30 30 30
251 30 30 30
252 30 30 30
253 30 30 30
254 30 30 30
255 30 30 30

--------------------------------------------------------------
Although this Federal Geographic Data Committee-compliant metadata
file is intended to document the data set in nonproprietary
form, as well as in ArcInfo format, this metadata file may
include some ArcInfo-specific terminology.

Use of trade names in this report is for identification purposes
only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological
Survey.
</supplinf>
		</descript>
		<timeperd>
			<timeinfo>
				<mdattim>
					<sngdate>
						<caldate>1991</caldate>
					</sngdate>
					<sngdate>
						<caldate>1999</caldate>
					</sngdate>
				</mdattim>
			</timeinfo>
			<current>
The data set is intended to represent conditions for the
1990&apos;s.
</current>
		</timeperd>
		<status>
			<progress>Complete</progress>
			<update>
No updates are planned unless
errors or updates in the data occur.
</update>
		</status>
		<spdom>
			<bounding>
				<westbc>-128.002463</westbc>
				<eastbc>-65.258046</eastbc>
				<northbc>51.691388</northbc>
				<southbc>22.838701</southbc>
			</bounding>
		</spdom>
		<keywords>
			<theme>
				<themekt>None</themekt>
				<themekey>inlandWaters</themekey>
				<themekey>Geographic Information Retrieval and Analysis System</themekey>
				<themekey>GIRAS</themekey>
				<themekey>Anderson land use/land cover</themekey>
				<themekey>Land Use Data Analysis</themekey>
				<themekey>LUDA</themekey>
				<themekey>LULC</themekey>
				<themekey>land use</themekey>
				<themekey>land cover</themekey>
				<themekey>urbanization</themekey>
				<themekey>residential land use</themekey>
				<themekey>urban land use</themekey>
				<themekey>1990 population</themekey>
			</theme>
			<place>
				<placekt>none</placekt>
				<placekey>Conterminous United States</placekey>
			</place>
		</keywords>
		<accconst>
None.
</accconst>
		<useconst>
This data should not be used at scales smaller than 1:250,000.
</useconst>
		<browse>
			<browsen>http://water.usgs.gov/GIS/browse/newlu90g.gif</browsen>
			<browsed>
Map of 1970&apos;s land use refined with 1990 population data
to indicate new residential development
</browsed>
			<browset>GIF</browset>
		</browse>
		<native>
Microsoft Windows 2000 Version 5.1 (Build 2600) Service Pack 1;
ESRI ArcCatalog 9.0.0.535
</native>
		<crossref>
			<citeinfo>
				<origin>James R. Anderson</origin>
				<origin>Ernest E. Hardy</origin>
				<origin>John T. Roach</origin>
				<origin>Richard E. Witmer</origin>
				<pubdate>1976</pubdate>
				<title>A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data</title>
				<serinfo>
					<sername>USGS Professional Paper</sername>
					<issue>964</issue>
				</serinfo>
				<pubinfo>
					<pubplace>Washington, DC</pubplace>
					<publish>U.S. Government Printing Office</publish>
				</pubinfo>
				<onlink>http://landcover.usgs.gov/pdf/anderson.pdf</onlink>
			</citeinfo>
		</crossref>
		<crossref>
			<citeinfo>
				<origin>USGS</origin>
				<pubdate>1986</pubdate>
				<title>
Land use and land cover data digital data from
1:250,000- and 1:100,000-scale maps, Data user guide 4
</title>
				<edition>First printing 1986, Second printing 1990</edition>
				<pubinfo>
					<pubplace>Reston, VA</pubplace>
					<publish>USGS</publish>
				</pubinfo>
				<onlink>http://www.vterrain.org/Culture/LULC/Data_Users_Guide_4.html</onlink>
			</citeinfo>
		</crossref>
		<crossref>
			<citeinfo>
				<origin>Kerie J. Hitt</origin>
				<pubdate>1994</pubdate>
				<title>
Refining 1970&apos;s land-use data with 1990 population data to
indicate new residential development
</title>
				<serinfo>
					<sername>USGS Water-Resources Investigations Report</sername>
					<issue>94-4250</issue>
				</serinfo>
				<pubinfo>
					<pubplace>Reston, Virginia</pubplace>
					<publish>U.S. Geological Survey</publish>
				</pubinfo>
				<onlink>http://water.usgs.gov/nawqa/wri94-4250/</onlink>
			</citeinfo>
		</crossref>
		<crossref>
			<citeinfo>
				<origin>Curtis Price</origin>
				<origin>Naomi Nakagaki</origin>
				<origin>Kerie Hitt</origin>
				<origin>Rick Clawges</origin>
				<pubdate>2003</pubdate>
				<title>Mining GIRAS: Improving on a national treasure of land use data</title>
				<serinfo>
					<sername>Proceedings of the ESRI International User Conference</sername>
					<issue>2003</issue>
				</serinfo>
				<pubinfo>
					<pubplace>Redlands, CA</pubplace>
					<publish>ESRI</publish>
				</pubinfo>
				<onlink>http://gis.esri.com/library/userconf/proc03/p0904.pdf</onlink>
			</citeinfo>
		</crossref>
		<crossref>
			<citeinfo>
				<origin>R.J. Gilliom</origin>
				<origin>W.M. Alley</origin>
				<origin>M.E. Gurtz</origin>
				<pubdate>1995</pubdate>
				<title>
Design of the National Water-Quality Assessment Program--Occurrence
and distribution of water-quality conditions
</title>
				<serinfo>
					<sername>USGS Circular</sername>
					<issue>1112</issue>
				</serinfo>
				<pubinfo>
					<pubplace>Reston, VA</pubplace>
					<publish>USGS</publish>
				</pubinfo>
				<onlink>http://pubs.water.usgs.gov/circ1112</onlink>
			</citeinfo>
		</crossref>
	</idinfo>
	<dataqual>
		<logic>
The data set was spot checked with the 100-m source grid of
enhanced LULC and a similar derivative product consisting of a
100-m grid of LULC updated with 2000 population.

Some logical assumptions are that areas that were &quot;new
residential&quot; urban land in 1990 would not revert to another land
use in 2000 and that &quot;new residential&quot; areas would expand from
1990 to 2000.  However, between 1990 and 2000, some Census block
group boundaries changed, and population density shifted.  As a
result, some areas considered to be &quot;new residential&quot; in 1990 no
longer are considered to be &quot;new residential&quot; in 2000.  In some
places, areas of &quot;new residential&quot; appear to be shrinking in 2000
because of the different block group boundaries.  Population
density in part of the area that used to be considered new
residential is less than the population density threshold value
in 2000. We do not plan to recompute population using another
Census Bureau parameter.
</logic>
		<complete>
Complete for conterminous United States.
</complete>
		<posacc>
			<horizpa>
				<horizpar>
Not checked.
</horizpar>
			</horizpa>
		</posacc>
		<lineage>
			<srcinfo>
				<srccite>
					<citeinfo>
						<origin>Robin G. Fegeas</origin>
						<origin>Robert W. Claire</origin>
						<origin>Stephen C. Guptill</origin>
						<origin>K. Eric Anderson</origin>
						<origin>Cheryl A. Hallam</origin>
						<pubdate>1983</pubdate>
						<title>
Digital cartographic data standards: Land use and land cover
digital data
</title>
						<geoform>digital data in GIRAS format</geoform>
						<serinfo>
							<sername>USGS Circular</sername>
							<issue>895-E</issue>
						</serinfo>
						<pubinfo>
							<pubplace>Reston, VA</pubplace>
							<publish>USGS</publish>
						</pubinfo>
						<onlink>http://edc.usgs.gov/products/landcover/lulc.html</onlink>
					</citeinfo>
				</srccite>
				<srcscale>250000</srcscale>
				<typesrc>digital</typesrc>
				<srctime>
					<timeinfo>
						<rngdates>
							<begdate>1970</begdate>
							<enddate>1985</enddate>
						</rngdates>
					</timeinfo>
					<srccurr>Ground condition, 1965-1980</srccurr>
				</srctime>
				<srccitea>LULC</srccitea>
				<srccontr>
This data set provided land use and land cover
representative of the 1970&apos;s-1980&apos;s for 1:250,000- or
1:100,000-scale quadrangles, compiled from aerial
photography.  The native digital format of the USGS LULC
data is Geographic Information Retrieval and Analysis
System (GIRAS).  The LULC provided the original base of
nationally consistent land use that was enhanced by users
over the years and then finally was refined with more
recent ancillary data on 1990 population to depict urban
areas more representative of the 1990&apos;s.
</srccontr>
			</srcinfo>
			<srcinfo>
				<srccite>
					<citeinfo>
						<origin>U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA)</origin>
						<pubdate>1994</pubdate>
						<title>
Land use and land cover data digital data from
1:250,000- and 1:100,000-Scale maps, digital quadrangles
converted to ArcInfo format
</title>
						<geoform>digital data in ArcInfo Export format</geoform>
						<pubinfo>
							<pubplace>Washington, DC</pubplace>
							<publish>USEPA</publish>
						</pubinfo>
						<onlink>http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/BASINS/metadata/giras.htm</onlink>
					</citeinfo>
				</srccite>
				<srcscale>250000</srcscale>
				<typesrc>digital</typesrc>
				<srctime>
					<timeinfo>
						<rngdates>
							<begdate>1970</begdate>
							<enddate>1985</enddate>
						</rngdates>
					</timeinfo>
					<srccurr>Ground condition, 1965-1980</srccurr>
				</srctime>
				<srccitea>EPAGIRAS</srccitea>
				<srccontr>
The Environmental Protection Agency worked with USGS to
convert the original LULC quadrangles from GIRAS format to
ArcInfo Workstation coverages.  After correcting minor errors
in the coverages, the USGS NAWQA program used the EPAGIRAS
data set in water-quality assessments during the mid-1990&apos;s.
</srccontr>
			</srcinfo>
			<srcinfo>
				<srccite>
					<citeinfo>
						<origin>Curtis Price</origin>
						<pubdate>20031124</pubdate>
						<title>
1990 population density by block group
for the conterminous United States
</title>
						<geoform>map</geoform>
						<pubinfo>
							<pubplace>Reston, VA</pubplace>
							<publish>USGS</publish>
						</pubinfo>
						<onlink>http://water.usgs.gov/lookup/getspatial?uspopd90x10g</onlink>
					</citeinfo>
				</srccite>
				<srcscale>100000</srcscale>
				<typesrc>digital raster data</typesrc>
				<srctime>
					<timeinfo>
						<sngdate>
							<caldate>1990</caldate>
						</sngdate>
					</timeinfo>
					<srccurr>As of 1990 Census</srccurr>
				</srctime>
				<srccitea>USPOPD90X10G</srccitea>
				<srccontr>
This data set provided a 100-m resolution ArcInfo Workstation
grid (raster data set in which each cell is 100-m x 100-m) of
1990 population density by block group prepared using data
from the 1990 Census of Population and Housing (P.L. 94-171
redistricting data) and 1990 TIGER/Line block group
boundaries. Grid cell values represent population density in
people per square kilometer multiplied by 10 so that the data
could be stored as integer.  The population data was used to
enhance the older, less-detailed LULC land use data to
represent urban areas more representative of the 1990&apos;s.
</srccontr>
			</srcinfo>
			<procstep>
				<procdesc>
During the early 1990&apos;s, USGS and the Environmental Protection
Agency (USEPA) converted USGS LULC maps from GIRAS format to
ArcInfo Workstation coverages.  USEPA disseminated the ArcInfo
Workstation coverages of LULC quads as ArcInfo export files
(USEPA, 1994).

During the mid- to late 1990&apos;s, the USGS NAWQA program
downloaded coverages of LULC quads from USEPA and corrected
many minor errors in the quads.  NAWQA used this corrected set
of quads for water-quality applications during the mid-1990&apos;s.
However, many coding and topological errors still remained in
the NAWQA version of the LULC coverages.

During 2002-2003, NAWQA developed an enhanced LULC data set
that was more accurate, topologically clean, and seamless.
(For example, land use attribute errors were fixed and quad
boundaries were matched.)  Price and others (2003) describe
the GIS processing steps to create the enhanced LULC data set.
The enhanced version of LULC is the &quot;best available&quot; version
of the historical USGS LULC data set.
</procdesc>
				<procdate>2000</procdate>
			</procstep>
			<procstep>
				<procdesc>
The ArcInfo Workstation seamless polygon coverage of enhanced
LULC data was converted to a 30-m resolution ArcInfo
Workstation grid (a raster data set in which each grid cell is
30-m by 30-m).
</procdesc>
				<procdate>2003</procdate>
			</procstep>
			<procstep>
				<procdesc>
The 30-m ArcInfo Workstation grid of the enhanced LULC
data set (girasg) was refined using the 100-m resolution ArcInfo
Workstation grid of 1990 Census block group population density
using the methods described in Hitt (1994).

Any area having a 1990 population density of at least 1,000
people per square mile (coded as 3,860 people per square km in
the 100-m population density grid) that was not coded as urban
or water in the LULC input data, was re-coded as &quot;new
residential&quot; land use in the output data set.  A numeric land
use code of &quot;10&quot; was assigned to the &quot;new residential&quot; areas.
This was accomplished using the following ArcInfo Workstation
GRID commands:

NEWLU90G = con ( ( girasg ge 11 and girasg le 17 ) or
  ( girasg ge 51 and girasg le 54 ) or ( girasg eq 0 ), girasg,
  con(uspopd90x10g ge 3860,10,girasg) )

The resulting grid has 38 categorical values: 37 corresponding
to the original Anderson level 2 land use land cover
categories plus 1 for the &quot;new residential&quot; category.  Because
the quality of the output data is no better than the coarsest
resolution of the input data (100 meters), the resolution of
the output grid was set to 100 meters even though the
resolution of the input LULC data grid was 30 meters. The
ArcGIS software automatically resamples unequal input cell
sizes to the output cell size.
</procdesc>
				<procdate>20030128</procdate>
			</procstep>
			<procstep>
				<procdesc>
The grid was converted to a GeoTIFF image for distribution
using the following ArcInfo Workstation command:

gridimage newlu90g newlu90g.clr newlu90g tiff
</procdesc>
				<procdate>20050110</procdate>
			</procstep>
			<procstep>
				<procdesc>
Data set was reviewed by Jacqueline Nolan, USGS, Reston,
VA. (1/24/2005).  Here is a summary of her comments, with
responses to the comments in brackets:

I think that you have everything well documented, and
referenced and could not find any problems.  My one area of
concern is under the &quot;Logical Consistency Report&quot; section
which described the earlier work.  In this you state that the
&quot;new residential&quot; areas in 2000 appear to be shrinking due to
the changes in block group boundaries.  Does this mean that
the current grid represents the status quo for that timeframe;
and if so, will there be any effort to recompute population
using another Census Bureau parameter (if there is one)?
[Added: &quot;We do not plan to recompute population using another
Census Bureau parameter.&quot; to the text.]

Under Supplemental Information and under Entity and Attribute
Overview for newlu90g, 386 people per square kilometer should
read &quot;3860&quot; .  [True, the values in the grid were multiplied
by 1000, but the classification scheme remains the same, i.e.,
&quot;residential&quot; land is any area with population density of at
least 1,000 people per square mile (386 people per square
kilometer).]

Under the Anderson Classification System - Code 2 Agricultural
land, level 2 - Confined &quot;feeeding&quot; operations (misspelling)
[Corrected spelling.]

The overall grid looks good when viewed in ArcMap; colors are
well chosen and coding is concise.  I think you have created a
very useful product.
</procdesc>
				<procdate>20050314</procdate>
			</procstep>
			<procstep>
				<procdesc>
Data set was reviewed by Susan Buto, USGS, Carson City,
NV. (1/26/2005) Here is a summary of her comments, with
responses to the comments in brackets:

1.  General metadata

a. I ran the metadata in both .xml and .met format through
&quot;mp&quot; which found no errors in either file.

b. I examined the metadata file that resides with the grid by
opening it in ArcCatalog.  I also exported it to a .txt
file which I ran through mp.  This file generated three
errors as follows:

i.  mp 2.8.12 - Peter N. Schweitzer (U.S. Geological Survey)
ii.  Error (line 740): Process_Date is required in Process_Step
iii.  Error (line 743): Process_Date is required in Process_Step
iv.  Error (line 746): Process_Date is required in Process_Step
v.  3 errors: 3 missing

These errors occur because ArcCatalog records a process
step when you import metadata or move the dataset.
Either these process steps should be deleted so the
&quot;internal&quot; metadata file is formatted to match the
published version or the xml should be deleted from the
coverage directory so you don&apos;t have to keep up with
it. [Deleted the metadata.xml file that resides in the
grid directory.]

c. Our group is having an ongoing discussion regarding the
use of the supplemental information section.  We are split
into two camps - those that think this section is a good place
to put a narrative describing the process steps and
any other information the author thinks is pertinent and
those that think much of the information in this section
is redundant.  Since I am a member of the second camp, I
think that everything that has nowhere else to go (how the
grid is stored, how to unzip/untar it, and what the result
of the unzip/untar process is) should be removed and
placed in the purpose, abstract and process steps.  This
suggestion is absolutely subject to your interpretation.
The FGDC includes no guidelines for the use of this
section in the metadata workbook
(http://www.fgdc.gov/publications/documents/metadata/workbook_0501_bmk.pdf).
[No change to supplementary information.]

d. I am unclear on the use of the term &quot;Visual checks&quot; in the
completeness report (in data quality information).  The
FGDC metadata workbook suggests that the completeness
report is used in &quot;describing the relationship between the
objects represented and the abstract universe of all such
objects.  In particular, the report shall describe the
exhaustiveness of a set of features&quot;.  I interpret this
statement as an abstract way to say that the completeness
report describes omissions from the data set.  The
completeness report should simply state that the data set
is &quot;complete for (some geographic area)&quot; if there are no
known omissions to report. [Changed to: &quot;Complete for
conterminous United States.&quot;]

2.  Spelling/Grammar/Usage

a. In Keywords: The first theme keyword is inlandWaters -
should that be inland waters?  Is that really a primary
theme? [The keyword &quot;inlandWaters&quot; is required for
Geospatial One Stop indexing.]

b. In the process description dated 20030128, your tense
changes between paragraphs.  Paragraph 1 is in past tense
and paragraph 2 is in present tense.  Your other process
steps are in past tense. [Changed paragraph 2 to past
tense.]

c. In the process step dated 20050110, &quot;commands&quot; should be
singular since there is only one. [Changed to singular.]

d. You can put this comment in the category of &quot;picky
reviewer&quot;, but some of your descriptions of Anderson level
2 land use codes do not match the text in Anderson and
others, 1976. This is true for:
14 - Transportation, communication, and utilities;
22 - Orchards, groves, vineyards, nurseries, and ornamental horticulture areas ;
73 - Sandy areas other than beaches;
75 - Strip mines, quarries, and gravel pits;
83 - Bare ground tundra. [All terms listed were corrected.]

e. In your enumeration of land use codes - 11 - Residential,
Residential is misspelled and in 23 - confined feeding
operations, feeding is misspelled.  [Spelling corrected.]

3.  Data Set and process steps

a. The data set unzipped properly and as described in the
metadata.

b. The .vat and .sta tables were intact and display as
described in the metadata.

c. The color table works properly.

d. Results of &quot;describe&quot;, &quot;list&quot; and &quot;items&quot; in workstation
correspond to the metadata descriptions.

e. A spot check of grid cell values and inspection of the
.vat yielded no unexpected values

f. Overall, the process steps make sense and the discussion
of changes to census block group boundaries and their
effect on the data is clear and concise.  However, I don&apos;t
see a statement describing how you ended up with a 100
meter grid when you started with a 30 meter GIRAS grid
developed from the enhanced LULC data in your first
process step.  The condition statement in the step dated
20030128 returns girasg or places the value 10 in the
cells where the population density warrants it.  Was
girasg the 30 meter enhanced LULC grid you started with?

[Added clarification to text: &quot;Because the quality of the
output data is no better than the coarsest resolution of
the input data (100 meters), the resolution of the output
grid was set to 100 meters even though the resolution of
the input LULC data grid was 30 meters.  The GIS software
automatically resamples unequal input cell sizes to the
output cell size.&quot;]
</procdesc>
				<procdate>20050314</procdate>
			</procstep>
		</lineage>
	</dataqual>
	<spdoinfo>
		<direct>Raster</direct>
		<rastinfo>
			<rasttype>Grid Cell</rasttype>
			<rowcount>29150</rowcount>
			<colcount>46240</colcount>
			<vrtcount>1</vrtcount>
		</rastinfo>
	</spdoinfo>
	<spref>
		<horizsys>
			<planar>
				<mapproj>
					<mapprojn>Albers Conical Equal Area</mapprojn>
					<albers>
						<stdparll>29.5</stdparll>
						<stdparll>45.5</stdparll>
						<longcm>-96</longcm>
						<latprjo>23</latprjo>
						<feast>0.00000</feast>
						<fnorth>0.00000</fnorth>
					</albers>
				</mapproj>
				<planci>
					<plance>coordinate pair</plance>
					<coordrep>
						<absres>100.0</absres>
						<ordres>100.0</ordres>
					</coordrep>
					<plandu>Meters</plandu>
				</planci>
			</planar>
			<geodetic>
				<horizdn>North American Datum of 1983</horizdn>
				<ellips>GRS1980</ellips>
				<semiaxis>6378137.000</semiaxis>
				<denflat>298.257222</denflat>
			</geodetic>
		</horizsys>
	</spref>
	<eainfo>
		<overview>
			<eaover>
The value of each 100-m by 100-m grid cell is the level 2 land
use and land cover classification code (Anderson and others,
1976) or a new level 2 code &quot;10&quot; (Hitt, 1994).

The new code &quot;10&quot; indicates &quot;new residential development,&quot; that
is, areas having 1990 population density of at least 1,000 people per
square mile (386 people per square kilometer) that were not
urban or water in the source LULC data.

The ArcInfo Workstation grid has a .VAT (value attribute table), with
two fields, VALUE and COUNT.

VALUE is the 2-digit LULC code (Anderson level 2) or new code &quot;10.&quot;

COUNT is the number of cells (assigned by ArcInfo) in each
LULC class.

The ArcInfo Workstation grid also has a .STA (statistics) file, with
the items MIN, MAX, MEAN, and STDV.

MIN is the minimum value in the grid (10).

MAX is the maximum value in the grid (92).

MEAN is the arithmetic mean of the values in the grid.
(MEAN is meaningless for categorical LULC data.)

STDV is the standard deviation of the values in the grid.
(STDV is meaningless for categorical LULC data.)

In the GeoTIFF image file, each index number corresponds to the
2-digit LULC code (Anderson level 2) or new code &quot;10.&quot;
</eaover>
			<eadetcit>
Land use and land cover classification codes and descriptions
are provided in Anderson and others (1976).
(See http://landcover.usgs.gov/pdf/anderson.pdf.)

The Anderson classification system is:

   LEVEL 1                  LEVEL 2
1  Urban or built-up land
                            11 Residential
                            12 Commercial and services
                            13 Industrial
                            14 Transportation, communication, and utilities
                            15 Industrial and commercial complexes
                            16 Mixed urban or built-up land
                            17 Other urban or built-up land

2  Agricultural land
                            21 Cropland and pasture
                            22 Orchards, groves, vineyards, nurseries,
                               and ornamental horticultural areas
                            23 Confined feeding operations
                            24 Other agricultural land

3  Rangeland
                            31 Herbaceous rangeland
                            32 Shrub and brush rangeland
                            33 Mixed rangeland

4  Forest land
                            41 Deciduous forest land
                            42 Evergreen forest land
                            43 Mixed forest land

5  Water
                            51 Streams and canals
                            52 Lakes
                            53 Reservoirs
                            54 Bays and estuaries

6  Wetland
                            61 Forested wetland
                            62 Nonforested wetland

7  Barren land
                            71 Dry salt flats
                            72 Beaches
                            73 Sandy areas other than beaches
                            74 Bare exposed rock
                            75 Strip mines, quarries, and gravel pits
                            76 Transitional areas
                            77 Mixed barren land

8  Tundra
                            81 Shrub and brush tundra
                            82 Herbaceous tundra
                            83 Bare ground tundra
                            84 Wet tundra
                            85 Mixed tundra

9  Perennial snow or ice
                            91 Perennial snowfields
                            92 Glaciers
</eadetcit>
		</overview>
	</eainfo>
	<distinfo>
		<distrib>
			<cntinfo>
				<cntorgp>
					<cntorg>U.S. Geological Survey</cntorg>
				</cntorgp>
				<cntpos>Ask USGS - Water Webserver Team</cntpos>
				<cntaddr>
					<addrtype>mailing address</addrtype>
					<address>445 National Center</address>
					<city>Reston</city>
					<state>VA</state>
					<postal>20192</postal>
					<country>USA</country>
				</cntaddr>
				<cntvoice>1-888-275-8747 (1-888-ASK-USGS)</cntvoice>
				<cntemail>http://water.usgs.gov/user_feedback_form.html</cntemail>
			</cntinfo>
		</distrib>
		<distliab>
Although this data set has been used by the U.S. Geological
Survey, U.S. Department of the Interior, no warranty expressed or
implied is made by the U.S. Geological Survey as to the accuracy
of the data and related materials. The act of distribution shall
not constitute any such warranty, and no responsibility is assumed
by the U.S. Geological Survey in the use of this data, software,
or related materials.

Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive
purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the
U.S. Government.
</distliab>
		<stdorder>
			<digform>
				<digtinfo>
					<formname>ArcInfo Workstation Grid</formname>
					<formcont>100-m x 100-m cell size raster data set</formcont>
					<filedec>gzip -d; gunzip</filedec>
					<transize>57 megabytes</transize>
				</digtinfo>
				<digtopt>
					<onlinopt>
						<computer>
							<networka>
								<networkr>http://water.usgs.gov/GIS/dsdl/newlu90g.tgz</networkr>
							</networka>
						</computer>
					</onlinopt>
				</digtopt>
			</digform>
			<digform>
				<digtinfo>
					<formname>GeoTIFF image</formname>
					<formcont>GeoTIFF file and .aux file</formcont>
					<filedec>gzip -d; gunzip</filedec>
					<transize>61 megabytes</transize>
				</digtinfo>
				<digtopt>
					<onlinopt>
						<computer>
							<networka>
								<networkr>http://water.usgs.gov/GIS/dsdl/newlu90g.tar.gz</networkr>
							</networka>
						</computer>
					</onlinopt>
				</digtopt>
			</digform>
			<digform>
				<digtinfo>
					<formname>ascii</formname>
					<formcont>Color map file for ArcInfo Workstation Grid</formcont>
					<transize>3.3 kilobytes</transize>
				</digtinfo>
				<digtopt>
					<onlinopt>
						<computer>
							<networka>
								<networkr>http://water.usgs.gov/GIS/dsdl/newlu90g.clr</networkr>
							</networka>
						</computer>
					</onlinopt>
				</digtopt>
			</digform>
			<fees>None.  This dataset is provided by USGS as a public service.</fees>
		</stdorder>
	</distinfo>
	<metainfo>
		<metd>20050314</metd>
		<metc>
			<cntinfo>
				<cntorgp>
					<cntorg>U.S. Geological Survey</cntorg>
				</cntorgp>
				<cntpos>Ask USGS - Water Webserver Team</cntpos>
				<cntaddr>
					<addrtype>mailing address</addrtype>
					<address>445 National Center</address>
					<city>Reston</city>
					<state>VA</state>
					<postal>20192</postal>
					<country>USA</country>
				</cntaddr>
				<cntvoice>1-888-275-8747 (1-888-ASK-USGS)</cntvoice>
				<cntemail>http://answers.usgs.gov/cgi-bin/gsanswers?pemail=h2oteam&amp;subject=GIS+Dataset+newlu90g</cntemail>
			</cntinfo>
		</metc>
		<metstdn>FGDC Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata (&quot;CSDGM version 2&quot;)</metstdn>
		<metstdv>FGDC-STD-001-1998</metstdv>
	</metainfo>
</metadata>
